Hi Alper,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 14:03, Alper Nebi Yasak alpernebiyasak@gmail.com wrote:
I've managed to build images like in doc/chromium/chainload.rst wtih binman, but ran into an issue with entry expansion in FIT and worked on it a bit. I also added SetImagePos() because that documentation asks for precise placement of u-boot.bin inside the FIT and I felt like doing it as an easier way to know the positions.
I would try to refactor and experiment with FIT things more, but I know Simon's currently working on converting SPL_FIT_GENERATOR to binman. Instead I'm just sending things I have already done with some tests added, hopefully without too many conflicts.
We'll see, but I'll apply this first in any case, to save you the trouble.
This all looks good. I've made a few comments which can be tidied up now or later. I was hoping to send my series out this morning but I didn't get much time over the weekend, so it might be another week. Hopefully not.
Alper Nebi Yasak (5): binman: Fix subentry expansion for FIT entry type binman: Register and check bintools from FIT subentries binman: Check missing bintools of Section subclasses binman: Convert FIT entry type to a subclass of Section entry type binman: Update image positions of FIT subentries
tools/binman/etype/fit.py | 90 ++++++--- tools/binman/etype/section.py | 1 + tools/binman/ftest.py | 183 ++++++++++++++++++ .../binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts | 39 ++++ 4 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts
-- 2.34.1
Regards, Simon