On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 10:46, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Where did I go wrong?
On 2004-07-16 you sent these messages:
[PATCH] MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5136550&forum_id=...
[PATCH] Part 1 of 2 MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch-1 for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5137350&forum_id=...
[PATCH] Part 2 of 2 MPC85XXADS-20040716.patch-2 for TLB/DDR http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5137351&forum_id=...
Now is this all the same stuff, or two or maybe even three different patches?
Right. The first message was rejected as being too large. I broke it into two parts that do the same patch and resubmitted it with a -1 and a -2 suffix.
The subject says "for TLB/DDR".
Yes, I rewrote the TLB and DDR handling.
Changesets that contain different, unrelated modifications shall be submitted as SEPARATE patches, one patch per changeset.
They aren't really unreleated. For example, there were missing TLB entries for PCI address spaces that were added. The removal of the molding options was specifically to clean up the TLBs.
To make this short: which of your 3 messages shall be added?
Please add all of them as they all apply and are important.
Wolfgang Denk
Thanks, jdl