Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Kevin,
On 12 February 2010 05:29, kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk kevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
On 11/02/2010 19:04, Tom wrote:
Kevin Morfitt wrote:
Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case to lower-case.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfittkevin.morfitt@fearnside-systems.co.uk
v2 changes - re-number to be 3/3 v3 changes - re-based to modified patch 2/3
checkpatch.pl reports no errors. MAKEALL ARM9 reports no new warnings or errors.
I had problem applying v2 patch 1 to u-boot-arm and u-boot-samsung Can you check if this patchset is correctly rebased.
It's based against Monday's u-boot-master which hasn't changed since then. v1 was against u-boot-samsung but Wolfgang asked me to do it against u-boot-master:
"Please adhere to posting guidelines. Patches posted ere MUST be based either on the "master" or on the "next" trees."
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-December/065420.html
If so, who can apply this patchset? I think need to rebase for u-boot-arm or u-boot-samsung.
Kevin is correct.
This is a problem with the arm and samsung branch diverging from master. The testing of this patch will stall a bit until we are sync-ed up again. I will make sure this happens in the next day or so.
Minkyu, There are 3 commits on samsung/master. Are these ready for a pull request? Please send me one if they are.
Tom