Hi,
On Oct 22, 2014 11:10 PM, "Andreas Bießmann" andreas.devel@googlemail.com wrote:
It also seems the maintainer of snapper9260 is not reachable. Simon, do you own such a board?
Yes I have one. The base address is to make the maximum amount of room for loading the kernel, etc.
Regards, Simon
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
On 23.10.14 07:07, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Simon,
On 06.10.14 20:14, Simon Glass wrote:
The value should be 0x23f00000. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org ---
include/configs/snapper9260.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/snapper9260.h b/include/configs/snapper9260.h index 1ebee71..adb09c2 100644 --- a/include/configs/snapper9260.h +++ b/include/configs/snapper9260.h @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ #include <asm/hardware.h> #include <linux/sizes.h>
-#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x20000000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x23f00000
I wonder why this is required. It depends on the first stage loader snapper9260 uses and I guess the first value is the right one used in the factory programmed loader. Nevertheless other at91 boards use 0x21f00000 due to relocation issues on boards with less RAM. It seems the snapper9260 has just 64MiB of RAM, this means just 1MiB of space for relocated u-boot, malloc arena, ... This was exactly the reason for other at91 boards to switch to 0x21f00000 as base address.
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann