31 Oct
2016
31 Oct
'16
10:32 a.m.
On Monday 31 October 2016 02:50 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Jagan Teki jagan@openedev.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Vignesh R vigneshr@ti.com wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2016 11:16 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: [...]
{"S25FL128P_64K", INFO(0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL032P", INFO(0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL064P", INFO(0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL128S_256K", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL128S_64K", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL256S_256K", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL256S_64K", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FS512S", INFO(0x010220, 0x4D00, 128 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },{"S25FL512S_256K", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },Could you change above S25FS512S and S25FL512S_256K to use INFO6 macro? Right now, S25FL512S_256K gets detected as S25FS512S and sf update fails due as erasesizes are different.
I think this seems to be an existing issue, even before these changes. after this [1] I will prepare a patch to use INFO6 for S25FS512S.
[1] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot-spi.git;a=commitdiff;h=13c17cad45ad9040fd0f6eba...
Try u-boot-spi/next?
Yes, that works. sf probe correctly detects S25FL512S_256K. Thanks!
--
Regards
Vignesh