On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 11/7/19 3:10 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: [...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi index 322c858c4b..d55460755f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ }; };
+&clkmgr {
u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;+};
&rst { u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; }; @@ -17,3 +21,7 @@ &sdr { u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; };
+&sysmgr {
u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;+};
Gen5 doesn't have any clock driver, so does it really make sense to retain the clkmgr node in SPL now ? Seems like this only grows the SPL size with no benefit.
But, we need to get clkmgr base address from DT even we don't have clock driver for it. So, clkmgr needs enable in SPL.
Regards Ley Foon