27 Oct
2009
27 Oct
'09
8:04 p.m.
Dear Jens Scharsig,
In message 4AE7110B.7030801@bus-elektronik.de you wrote:
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
And by the way: please chose a board name that can be used consistently:
+EB_CPUx9K2_config : unconfig
- @$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) arm arm920t EB+CPUx9K2 BuS at91rm9200
If the target name is EB_CPUx9K2 (why are you shouting here?) then the board directory and config file names shall be based on EB_CPUx9K2, too.
It's a incomplete rename by my side. sorry.
Wath name/syntax do you prefer? eb_cpux9k2... or eb+cpux9k2...
'+' is not a valid character in any identifier, so please avoid this.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White