On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:44:53PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
In message 002601c79d29$4da6de70$3125b10a@atmel.com you wrote: Just because others don't agree with you does not mean the sabotage you. Robert Schwebel and others tried to explain this to you before.
Disagreement with me is not sabotage, but I consider removing "board/at91rm9200dk" just because it does not work, sabotage. It forces additional work on me, and I fail to see any advantage.
I proposed removing board/at91rm9200dk just because noone was able to review patch I sent. Here is reference: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/27997 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:37:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix U-Boot base address depending on CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
I have strong feeling (based on zero interest I received), that noone is interested in this board and therefore it is safe to remove support for it. Got my point?
Best regards, ladis