
12 Feb
2004
12 Feb
'04
1:05 a.m.
Dear Brad,
in message CFE1C3BDE1264C4D9E569E89B3AF8FA86C527F@grubber.seranoa.com you wrote:
It looks like there was a check in to cfi_flash.c between the time I made the patch and now. It looks completely cosmetic, just white space changes.
No patch was checked in. It was just me cleaning up all the formatting issues in your code.
Here is a new patch against the head of the tree.
And again this patch is - strictly speaking - violating the for- matting rules as specified in section "Coding Standards" in the README.
Wolfgang, please use this patch(cfi_flash_patch2) instead of the previous patch (cfi_flash_patch).
Done. But please make sure to clean up yoour code next time.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
See us @ Embedded World, Nuremberg, Feb 17 - 19, Hall 12.0 Booth 440
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be
wrong. -- Chris Torek