On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message AANLkTilaJ7MVv7VxxreBkCCSzYSZVSqULk_3I5AHlS4s@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I'm sure you'll argue that this is poor development management, but I find myself more efficient if a 'get in the zone' and then go back and break things up. It also serves as a really good self imposed code review
No, I don't argue. I'm trying to undestand. I am well aware that there are many tools for the same tasks, and the most efficient ones are these you know well, so "vi" is probably much more eficient to me than your favorite editor is to you. But I always like at least to know what the tools can do that I don't use or don't know that well - sometimes - sometimes i's time to make room in the toolbox for a new tool or another :-)
Knowing what tools others use (and those tools influence how people work) is very helpful in understanding how and why people do what they do
You have a very good grip on git, and I would suggest stg is not really going to make your life any easier. I know only a few git commands, so stg is good for me. Who knows, over time I may get to know git well enough to not need stg any more ;)
-- Graeme