On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <0EB7516A-2F14-42F7- A6ED-555ADFAB3105@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
Allocate more space for U-Boot?
I might turn of BEDBUG as its never been properly enabled on e500/85xx platforms.
Is there any problem with the bigger image which I don't understand yet? Normally we just move down the TEXT_BASE by a sector, and that's it.
Not specifically, its just that ever 85xx image to date has been 512k. I'm just trying to avoid this being the first one that changes that historic fact. Especially since compilers like gcc-4.3 seem to be able to fit the size in 512k.
Off of 512K something like 1/3 is empty in e.g. MPC8548CDS. The very last sector contains fixed location power-on boot vector, the beginning of those 512K has actual U-Boot code and the hole between them is big enough to fit an entire sector for environment.
--- ****************************************************************** * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. * * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. * ******************************************************************