Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Hi,
Please pull The following changes since commit 3aa8b68d80dbcb6829af60485c1e388b39af793d: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'next' of ../next
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
Albin Tonnerre (3): at91sam9260/afeb9260: Fix SPI initialization Add support for the Calao SBC35-A9G20 board Support for the Calao TNY-A9260/TNY-A9G20 boards
Frederik Kriewitz (1): Add support for the DevKit8000 board
I'd like to have the omap3_devkit8000.h version of that patch, instead.
this one is fine no need not the omap3_devkit8000 version
Jean-Christophe: In
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html
we agreed on omap3_devkit8000.
in v4 the author prefer it devkit8000 so I respect it
You missed v5 and v6, no?
for the l2_cache I'm fine to move to omap3 as it's really omap3 specific
Again, you confuse people. From your previous mail:
"as I said now more than 10 times on omap3 we can use the generic ARMV7 cache code"
we clearly need to clean the omap3 and not force other soc to duplicate code
With
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html
we just try to do the opposite: Move the custom code away so that Samsung can use its own (generic?) implementation.
Dirk