On 2021/8/30 22:14, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:20 AMjiladahe1997@gmail.com jiladahe1997@gmail.com wrote:
From 934d43a647bfee33f32f710500c75ef2490f25f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mingrui Renjiladahe1997@gmail.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:35:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] board/imx6sabresd: add imx6solo during FIT matching
When using imx6solo cpu, the 'board_fit_config_name_match' function will return -1, then u-boot will choose wrong FIT, and causing further problems.
imx6solo is similar to imx6dl, so I just add it into imx6dl.
Signed-off-by: Mingrui Renjiladahe1997@gmail.com
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c index 8c35230855..0bd968411e 100644 --- a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c +++ b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name) } else if (is_mx6dqp()) { if (!strcmp(name, "imx6qp-sabresd")) return 0;
- } else if (is_mx6dl()) {
- } else if (is_mx6dl() || is_mx6solo()) {
I thought that NXP did not manufacture any mx6solo sabresd board, only mx6dl/q/qp sabresd.
Do you have access to a mx6solo sabresd? Or did you make this change because you have designed your own board based on the sabresd with a mx6solo device.
Please clarify.
Hi Fabio,
Thanks for your reply. I'm using my own board based on sabresd with mx6solo.
The reson I made this change is that I found on the mx6solo official website: https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-processors/... In "Development Boards and Designs",it seems that sabresd is used as the development board.
Also,the Reference Manual of mx6solo is same as mx6dl.
In summary,I think if someone is going to use mx6solo, he will refer to sabresd board. So please consider this patch.
Cheers,
Mingrui Ren