Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mips: tolerate the MIPS 'CFG_HZ' values in the MHZ range for NAND delays

Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:

In message 20080520102743.6557124b@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com you wrote:

...

Is it acceptable to define it as 1024 on some boards? It's more accurate if you're running the timer from a 32.768 kHz oscillator (e.g. an RTC), and it makes timing calculations cheaper too...

We use a millisecond tick, so CFG_HZ == 1000.

Accuracy is not really an issue in almost all cases.

In which cases _is_ it an issue?

Haavard