On Thursday, October 06, 2011 05:54:17 PM Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU support library. This can be useful on some setups.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com Cc: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de Cc: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de Cc: Detlev Zundel dzu@denx.de Cc: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com
spl/Makefile | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644 --- a/spl/Makefile +++ b/spl/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
+# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this: +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE +endif
Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)?
Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol?
-Scott
Right, you can ignore this patch and apply only 2/2.
Cheers