22 Nov
2013
22 Nov
'13
9:42 a.m.
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here. Also, if secured firmware is an independent binary then it need not be open source.
In which case it should/can not have anything to do with u-boot nor reuse any GPL'd u-boot code. The platform should supply the PSCI service itself if you want to do this.
I for one don't see this as an advantage.
Ian.