On 2/16/21 12:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sean Anderson,
In message 20210216164016.635125-1-sean.anderson@seco.com you wrote:
Currently we fail silently if there is an algorithm mismatch. To help distinguish this failure condition.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson sean.anderson@seco.com
lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c b/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c index e34d3293d1..aee76f42d5 100644 --- a/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c +++ b/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c @@ -447,8 +447,11 @@ static int rsa_verify_with_keynode(struct image_sign_info *info, }
algo = fdt_getprop(blob, node, "algo", NULL);
- if (strcmp(info->name, algo))
- if (strcmp(info->name, algo)) {
debug("%s: Wrong algo: have %s, expected %s", __func__,info->name, algo);- }
If this is considered an error, should that not be a printf() then instead of a debug() which users will never see?
I also thought that, but the much of the rest of this file also uses debug() to report errors. Perhaps there are security implications? Or perhaps it was done to reduce binary size? Simon, can you comment on this?
--Sean
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk