
Hi
On Apr 10, 2015 7:38 PM, "Simon Glass" sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
On 27 February 2015 at 22:06, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
With driver model SPL support in place the remaining driver difference between U-Boot proper and SPL is that SPL does not support device tree. This series adds this support, using a Rockchip board as an example.
Glad to test on my firefly. Can you please give some basic test to flash on eMmc e/o on SDcard?
Michael
One problem with device tree is that U-Boot has no way of dropping
features
it does not need or use. For SPL this problem needs to be solved and
this
series uses the preprocessor for this. The 45KB Firefly device tree
reduces
to 693 bytes when unused material is removed. A better solution might involve the 'fdtgrep' tool but this has not made it into the device tree compiler as yet.
This series includes some changes aimed at reduce code size in SPL, including:
- dropping alias sequence support (the aliases node) since many boards
just
use a single UART in SPL
- adding a smaller panic() function that does not support
printf()-format
strings
- removing device unbind code which will never be used in SPL
Overall the resulting SPL binary is 8829 bytes with my Linaro 4.8.2
compiler,
including the device tree, using Thumb-2. Of this:
1768 bytes is driver model core code 1556 bytes is device tree code 693 bytes is the device tree itself 4756 is other code, including serial drivers, rodata and data
The last figure includes rodata incorrectly added by the tool chain [1]. With a bug-fixed gcc 4.9.2 the total size is 6893 bytes including device tree.
Approximately 750 bytes is used for strings and driver data (root device and serial) associated with driver model and device tree. This adds up
an
overhead of around 4750 bytes for driver model and device tree,
including
the code, rodata and device tree itself.
It should therefore be possible to use driver model and device tree in SPL for board that have enough SRAM. Clearly 4KB is impossible without further work (perhaps removing some error strings). I suspect 8KB would be tricky, allowing only 3KB for stack and other code. But 16KB should work OK.
SRAM sizes for recent SoCs I am aware of are:
Rockchip RK3288: 96KB Tegra 124: 128KB Samsung Exynos 5420: 384KB
The Rockchip Firefly was chosen for this work since it is a fairly
recent
board and is readily available. Rockchip engineers have been actively upstreaming code to Linux in the past year and there is a very full-featured U-Boot available. But it is invisible to most U-Boot people - mainline Rockchip support seems well overdue. This series does not make a serious start on that, since it only prints a message in SPL and then hangs, but additional work should get it booting to a prompt.
I've held off pushing this into u-boot-dm/next since it is RFC and the device tree part needs work. But I'm thinking of respinning it to apply it within the upcoming merge window, or at least the core patches.
Does anyone have comments at this stage?
Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot