On 13:54 Sun 03 Feb , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:25:54 +0100 Stelian Pop stelian@popies.net wrote:
Le samedi 02 février 2008 à 06:59 +0100, Stefan Roese a écrit :
I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too.
Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand into a specific directory.
Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91 based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202, mp2usb) ?
I think they should be collected according to board manufacturer or brand, not cpu type. So boards/atmel is for boards manufactured by Atmel, not all boards that happen to have an Atmel cpu on them.
I agree too, they should be collected according to board manufacturer not cpu type.
Best Regards, J.