Hi Daniel, Wolfgang,
On Monday 18 July 2011 07:49 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Wolfgang Denkwd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4E242306.1000007@aribaud.net you wrote:
What might bother *you*, however, is that ATM the SPL framework patches are RFC, so they won't be applied as such, and Aneesh's OMAP4 patches are not applied yet. And you need those patches applied for yours to be. But if it *does* happen, I am fine with it. :)
I hope we see a final version of these patches very soon, and I am willing to pull these into the upcoming release.
so can I or shall I resend the whole SPL series with the subject changed to "[PATCH v3 N/M]"?
Do you have any comments on patch "[RFC PATCH v2 2/9] spl: add initial support for a generic SPL" where I added the requested documentation?
Probably one more small change is required in 2/9. CONFIG_SYS_SPL_LDSCRIPT needs to be CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT for the sake of consistency.
br, Aneesh