Dear Sandeep,
In message 0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D93521EC0@dlee01.ent.ti.com you wrote:
There were some issues with "Overo Tobi ethernet support".
I am aware of these.
There was a follow up patch that was actually inline in an e-mail rather than formally being a patch. Thus I had to give it my own subject header.
Please do not do this. Always keep the original Subject: lines in place.
If needed, then request a resend of the patch (or resent it yourself).
If you feel this is persnickety then please bear with me, but so far my "patch tracking" is based on the messages posted to the mailing list, and to make this work the Subject of the messages must match the title line of the commit messages.
basically as you can see even I got confused as there was no formal patch. The patch was kind of inline and once Ben was OK as can be seen above, I applied it. I gave it my own header because I had to give something.
I hope this clears and lingering issues
Yes, it does. Thanks for the explanation. But next time let's please rather insist on a repost of a separate, easier to track patch.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk