Hello Simon,
On 10/03/2015 04:28 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Przemyslaw,
On 21 September 2015 at 13:26, Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com wrote:
This platform is based on Exynos5800 but the cpu id is 0x5422. This doesn't fit the common Exynos SoC name convention, so now, the CPU name is defined by device tree string, to be printed properly.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com
Changes V2:
- move cpu name from config to dts
arch/arm/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts b/arch/arm/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts index 1d7ff23..76826dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts +++ b/arch/arm/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
/ { model = "Samsung/Google Peach Pi board based on Exynos5800";
cpu-model = "Exynos5800"; compatible = "google,pit-rev#", "google,pit", "google,peach", "samsung,exynos5800", "samsung,exynos5";-- 1.9.1
Is this defined by the standard binding? If not, can you add or change the binding file?
Regards, Simon
No, it's not standard. I will add binding info.
Best regards