On Wed 22 Apr 2020 at 18:04, Marek Behun marek.behun@nic.cz wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:46:25 +0800 Su Yue Damenly_Su@gmx.com wrote:
- while (*cur != '\0') { + + cur =
skip_current_directories(cur); + len = next_length(cur); + if (len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN) {
next_length() promises @len <= BTRFS_NAME_LEN, so the check is trivial.
Okay.
Hmm. This is a bug in next_length. I meant for next_length to return len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN in case of too long name. Thanks for noticing.
ret = btrfs_readlink(root, ino, target); +if (ret < 0) { + free(target); + return ret; + } + target[ret] = '\0';
It was done in btrfs_readlink() already.
It is in old btrfs_readlink, but is it even after this patches? I don't see it in the new implementation.
You are right. The thing changed in the 17th patch. btrfs_readlink() doesn't set the null byte now.
-- Su
ret = btrfs_lookup_path(root, ino, target, &next_root,&next_ino, &next_type,symlink_limit);Just notify gentlely this is a recursive call here. I don't know whether uboot cares about stack things. But, recursion makes coding simpler :).
It is limited by symlink_limit. Until somebody complains about stack issues I would like to keep it simple.