On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 17, 2011 06:48:41 PM Simon Glass wrote:
We won't actually load an image with this architecture, but we still need to define it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
common/image.c | 5 +++-- include/image.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c index d38ce4a..8283561 100644 --- a/common/image.c +++ b/common/image.c @@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ int boot_get_fdt (int flag, int argc, char * const argv[], bootm_headers_t *imag goto error; }
- printf (" Booting using the fdt blob at 0x%x\n",
(int)fdt_blob);
- printf(" Booting using the fdt blob at 0x%p\n", fdt_blob);
Well this is a fix and the patch description doesn't match it.
Can you split it or something?
Yes ok, there are a couple like this. When this becomes real patch I will separate them out. This one should be split so that image.c and image.h are separate patches.
Regards, Simon
Cheers