Am Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2003 14:27 schrieb Woodruff, Richard:
What aspect didn't work for you? Its all pretty simple, and derived from the kernel driver. Its worked on my ARM boards with out problem since 1.0.0 was release.
The patch isn't wrong, but standing in conflict with a patch I've posted two or three weeks ago. Last weekend Wolfgang have put my patch into CVS tree befor working on your patch. So your patch conflicts.
As far as these patches having conflicts, they were conflict free as of 1.0.0 and the conflicts were probably added in by you the day before. I don't mind grabbing the day newer versions and merging to those. It can be a bit of a pain to do direct CVS checkouts from where my machine sits. Prior to doing any kind of big merge I usually just get tars off of your site. If you post a tar I will apply against that quicker.
Regards,
Richard W.
-----Original Message----- From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:42 PM To: Woodruff, Richard Cc: 'u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] probe for smc91111.c before chip init.
In message 71555548814716479478431542AA5F8A059043@dlee2k04.ent.ti.com you
wrote:
Seems I did the order wrong in the diff. Here is the corrected version.
Does not work either. It conflicts with the current version of the source in CVS. Can you please check, and resubmit?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk