On Wednesday 03 August 2022 13:28:01 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 01 August 2022 19:15:46 Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 09:39:00PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 01 August 2022 13:13:22 Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Pali,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 09:43, Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org wrote:
Currently Makefile produces final mpc85xx image when SPL is not used in custom file u-boot-with-dtb.bin. It is quite confusing name as build process produce also intermediate file standard file u-boot-dtb.bin (which is just intermediate and not bootable). Other platforms use u-boot.bin (UBOOT_BIN) as standard name for final bootable raw image.
So change Makefile rules and binman to produce final bootable file for mpc85xx also into file u-boot.bin. There is just need for mpc85xx to not define default rule for u-boot.bin then instruct binman (via DTS file) to store final image into u-boot.bin (instead of u-boot-with-dtb.bin) and finally rename target u-boot-with-dtb.bin to u-boot.bin.
With this change are also removed custom Makefile hacks for mpc85xx that it produced non-standard output file. And also updated documentation.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali@kernel.org
Makefile | 19 +++++-------------- arch/powerpc/dts/kmcent2-u-boot.dtsi | 2 +- arch/powerpc/dts/u-boot.dtsi | 2 +- board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/README | 2 +- board/freescale/p2041rdb/README | 3 --- board/freescale/t102xrdb/README | 2 +- board/freescale/t104xrdb/README | 2 +- board/freescale/t208xqds/README | 2 +- board/freescale/t208xrdb/README | 2 +- 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
At present u-boot.bin has a very standard meaning - it is U-Boot with the DT.
Boards which need something more than that can/should use binman to create a separate file.
I certainly agree that u-boot-with-dtb.bin is a terrible name, though. Something more descriptive would be better.
But is it possible to drop these SoC-specific rules in the Makefile and just build everything needed in the standard binman rule in the Makefile?
Regards, Simon
I do not know what is binman doing and how to use it. I just do not see reason why it is needed to use such additional tool for building final binary for powerpc/mpc85xx as other arm boards do not use it at all.
Ad your comment "At present u-boot.bin has a very standard meaning - it is U-Boot with the DT." - This is exactly what binman for mpc85xx produces.
So I see there could be improvements, but as a first step this my patch should be enough?
So, one of the issues with PowerPC stuff is that much of it is so far behind the rest of U-Boot in terms of frameworks. So yes, let us start by fixing the functional problem you're describing here and then see what appetite exists for further work here.
-- Tom
Ok, so these two patches in this patch series is a starting point.
Now I send another patch which does another cleanup in this area: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220803112442.4735-1-pali@...
PING?