Dear Ruchika Gupta,
In message 1412676666-31325-1-git-send-email-ruchika.gupta@freescale.com you wrote:
Hardware accelerated support for SHA-1 and SHA-256 has been added. Hash command enabled along with hardware accelerated support for SHA-1 and SHA-256 for platforms which have CAAM block.
#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x00560000) #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x00570000) #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SERDES_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x00ea0000) +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x700000) +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_JR0_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x710000) #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x00ee0000) #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_LS1_CLK_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x00ee1000) #define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1 (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR + 0x011c0500)
Would it not make sense to keep this list sorted (by growing addresses)?
+int misc_init_r(void) +{
- if (sec_init() < 0)
return -1;- return 0;
+}
Would
return sec_init();
be equivalent? [If so,, then please fix globally.]
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk