Dear "=?utf-8?B?bWlhb2ZuZw==?=",
In message 200910261647227347739@gmail.com you wrote:
Hi mike, It seems there's a big difference between my current project and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now
i want to get a packet from usb/network, then redirect it to can bus. So blocked write/read of can is not allowed.
On Monday 26 October 2009 00:48:39 miaofng wrote:
Thanks for careful review. I'll resend the patch according to your remarks except follwing: 1)
+int register_candev(struct can_device *dev)
use "can" or "candev", dont mix the two
answer: register_candev is origin from register_netdev(...). CAN is something like network, it may has high level protocols such as open-can and etc, so i want to keep that story.
i know what CAN is. the Linux approach makes sense because they've architected CAN at the socket() layer, and all of the network layers are written with common coding style. but there is no such socket/network layer
Arghhhh...
Your quoting is as broken as your (missing or incorrect) In-reply-to: and References: file headers. Please make sure to read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html, and make sure not to corrupt mail threads.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk