29 Oct
2007
29 Oct
'07
12:58 p.m.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:45:54 +0100 "Ulf Samuelsson" ulf@atmel.com wrote:
Also: I am not proposing a "default" address just that the user can, by running a command, set the ethaddr to something which is useful for production. If the user does not run the command, then the address will remain unset. Once the ethaddr is set to a different value, it should, as usual, not be possible to change it.
Oh. But why are you opposed to this change which simply removes the default address? You can still use setenv to set ethaddr to anything you want.
Håvard