3 Jan
2011
3 Jan
'11
7:38 p.m.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:35:45 -0500 Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Lei Wen leiwen@marvell.com wrote:
This patch sync with newest mtd code in Linux on handling nand_scan_ident.
is there any point to the sync ? doesnt seem like anyone is using the new option.
Even if Lei didn't need this for an upcoming driver, I see value in keeping in sync unless we have a good reason to deviate. It makes it easier to share drivers and bring over new features that we *do* want to use.
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c -const struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[] = { +struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[] = {
this is wrong
I agree.
-Scott