Re: [U-Boot-Users] CLI over Ethernet

Hi Srivatsan,

Greetings. There is a requirement to provide CLI over Ethernet in

uboot.

Really? There is a requirement? Anyway, check doc/README.NetConsole.

1) The CLI works over LAN (not using TCP/IP) using Logical link

control Layer. (Is this possible?)

It actually works over UDP.

2) Anyone who has done a similar stuff has any advice for us? (Not

in negative :-))

I guess everything is in place - just use it.

3) Is there any documentation or RFC available which talks of

(Ethernet) connectivity at LLC layer?

Thanks and Best Regards, C.R.Srivatsan

-----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of u-boot-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:43 PM To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: U-Boot-Users digest, Vol 1 #1106 - 13 msgs

Send U-Boot-Users mailing list submissions to u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to u-boot-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of U-Boot-Users digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. RE: CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Friedrich, Lars)
2. question on drive (zhonglei)
3. boot problem (Alessio Raccis)
4. Re: question on drive (Marc Leeman)
5. boot problem (Alessio Raccis)
6. R: [U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Paolo

Broggini) 7. Re: CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Wolfgang Denk) 8. Re: boot problem (Wolfgang Denk) 9. Re: question on drive (Wolfgang Denk) 10. Re: question on drive (Marc Leeman) 11. RE: CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Paugam Luc) 12. Re: CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Steven Scholz) 13. Re: CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200 (Wolfgang Denk)

[...]

Do you really think it neccessary to include the _whole digest mail_ in a question introducing a new thread? Please think about that in the future, even if it takes a few more keystrokes.

Cheers Detlev