On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com wrote:
On 12/13/2011 12:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:
Currently nand_spl_simple puts it's temp data at 0x10000 offset in SDRAM which is likely to contain already loaded data. The patch saves the oob data and the ecc on the stack replacing the fixed address in RAM.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de CC: Ilya Yanok yanok@emcraft.com CC: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com CC: Tom Rini tom.rini@gmail.com CC: Simon Schwarz simonschwarzcor@googlemail.com CC: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de
Acked-by: Tom Rini trini@ti.com
Which covers the omap config file changes. Assuming Wolfgang doesn't see a problem with using SYS_... in defines, Scott, do you want this via your tree (in /next) since it's NAND or in mine since it's TI boards? Assuming you don't see any problems of course. Thanks!
The board-specific stuff is just removing unneeded NAND config items, and isn't depending on other non-NAND patches, so I can take it through my tree -- but if you want me to ACK it (once the minor issues are fixed) to go via your tree so you can build on top of it sooner, that's fine...
Just building up my /next tree and don't want this to get lost, so if you can take v4 once it's out and you're happy, I'd appreciate it. Thanks!