On 18:11 Wed 09 Jul , Detlev Zundel wrote:
Hi Magnus and Jens,
Basically, I agree. But would you accept the current patch for now? The new routines and macros later could be implemented later.
I don't think it's up to me to ACK or NAK this, but I can accept the current patch.
Yes, this decision is up to the custodian. But lets be honest here, we all know what "we can implement this later" means.
We really need to fix problems as they arise. Especially in this case I don't think that it is such a significant effort to fix it now. Fixing it later will only need even more effort.
Usually this effort(t-[detection time]) is an exponential function and I am not kidding on this.
I fully agree with you.
We need to fix this and not use a workaround which will became the status quo.
Best Regards, J.