Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Prevent malloc with size 0

On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:

b) The code calling malloc(0) is making a perfectly legitimate assumption based on how glibc handles malloc(0)

not really. POSIX says malloc(0) is implementation defined (so it may return a unique address, or it may return NULL). no userspace code assuming malloc(0) will return non-NULL is correct. -mike