On 07/01/2014 12:17 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 at 08:51:45 AM, Jörg Krause wrote:
On 07/01/2014 02:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Instead of weird allocation of ci_drv->items_mem and then even weirder distribution of offsets in this memory area into ci_drv->items array, just allocate ci_drv->items as a big slab of aligned memory (replaces ci_drv->items_mem) and let ci_get_qtd() do the distribution of offsets in this memory area.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Jörg Krause jkrause@posteo.de Cc: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c | 19 ++++++------------- drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
V2: Rebase on top of u-boot-usb/master instead of the research branch
[...]
I made a test on u-boot-arm/master before (Test#1) and after applying this patch (Test#2).
Can we please sync on the same codebase (u-boot-usb/master) ?
Sorry, this is a type. I tested on u-boot-usb/master.
After a reset I run this script: test_usb=setenv i 64; while test ${i} -gt 0; do echo ${i}; tftp ${rootfs_file}; setexpr i ${i} - 1; done; setenv i;
Both tests (Test#1 and Test#2) runs fine with the script. But if I do run tftp ${rootfs_file} manually from the console, I get the known error starting the fourth run for both Test#1 and Test#2.
Can you edit arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/cache.c and change the debug() to printf() , then re-test please ? I suspect this might trap something still. Ah, and please test on u-boot-usb/master with this patch.
No additional output on the console.
Best regards, Marek Vasut