Let's look at this example. Here is what I see on http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-October/thread.html.
[U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW David Collier [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Jason Liu [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: consolidate env for mmcboot and netboot Shawn Guo
But I really expect something like below (added In-Reply-To ID).
[U-Boot] U-boot versions - reply to RM + SW David Collier [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx51evk: support new relocation scheme Shawn Guo 1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn.gsc@gmail.com [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Shawn Guo 1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn.gsc@gmail.com [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Jason Liu [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx51evk: correct internal RAM base address Shawn Guo 1288019681-18496-1-git-send-email-shawn.gsc@gmail.com [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: consolidate env for mmcboot and netboot Shawn Guo
Is this some problem with u-boot mail list threading itself or the gmail mailer?