17 Sep
2012
17 Sep
'12
6:35 p.m.
On 09/17/12 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
[...]
If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the new target to u-boot-pad.bin
I think I'm OK with that.
What about having CPU-overridable targets ? So omap can have it's own .ubl result and commands leading to it ... and so can s3c24xx. Such targets would have to be shifted into CPU-specific dirs, is that possible?
The problem I see first is that "UBL" doesn't seem to mean anything in the context of s3c24xx, it just happens to be doing some of what the system wants.
--
Tom