
19 Jul
2010
19 Jul
'10
9:49 p.m.
Dear Stefano Babic,
In message 4C44A356.7090001@denx.de you wrote:
I always wondered why we need such a long (and slow to type) name. I suggest we use this opportunity and change the name into a plain and simple "FEC" resp. "SCC" and "FCC" ?
Then probably unify the rule even for other architectures. We have a
Agreed.
"FEC_MXC", too, for Freescale's i.MX processors. We can use "FEC_PPC", "SCC_PPC" if we want to add the architecture name (I do not think is useful), or better set the name to "FEC" for fec_mxc.c, too.
Sounds good to me. Would you like to submit a patch? :-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Let's say the docs present a simplified view of reality... :-)
- Larry Wall in 6940@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV