On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:25:31AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
On 07/10/2020 09.20, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
This enables one to use positional arguments $1..$9 in functions defined in the environment,
Tom, can I ask for a decision on these? I know Wolfgang is opposed, and if that counts as a veto, fine, I'd just like to know so these are at least not kept hanging indefinitely.
Sorry for the lack of feedback. I guess, I just don't know. There's at least two series now (this and Simon's setexp) where part of the feedback has been "our hush is ancient, and we should replace and keep it in sync, and add features _upstream_". That position isn't wrong. But it's not easy to do, either. I know you already said you didn't have time and wouldn't step up to do that.