On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:25:48AM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:08:23 -0400, Jason u-boot@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Since every Dreamplug on the market sets and uses MACH_TYPE_GURUPLUG, I think it's reasonable to use it (hopefully merged into u-boot) until the linux-arm tree gets sorted out and they accept new boards / machids. Then, the last patch can be added.
If we're going to re-flash a bunch of Dreamplug units with new u-boot, I'd prefer we go ahead and set a new id. If that means we have to carry around a local kernel patch for a while until the new id gets merged into the kernel.org tree, that seems much easier to cope with than having to flash yet another new u-boot later?
I agree, which is why I included patch 5. I've rebased my Linux dreamplug patches against v3.0 and am doing some testing, Hopefully I can push those out this weekend. I'll add you folks to the CC when I do that.
Do you think Linus, GregKH and others would flip if I suggested arch/arm/staging/* ? ;-)
thx,
Jason.