On 01/13/2014 07:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
Send RPC commands to the VideoCore to turn on the SDHCI and USB modules. For SDHCI this isn't needed in practice, since the firmware already turned on the power in order to load U-Boot. However, it's best to be explicit. For USB, this is necessary, since the module isn't powered otherwise. This will allow the kernel USB driver to work.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org
Could this please be applied for v2014.01? I know I did first post it after the merge window closed (by just a few hours...) but there's always plenty of other stuff that's accepted under similar timing.
Albert, sorry for responding to the patch rather than your mail, but for some reason I didn't get your response on Jan 14 where you wrote:
I'm not against taking this in as this affects only a single board (and provided Tom is OK too).
Tom, is this patch OK?
Also, I'd really like to know whether the three reposts are actually versions (in which case I'd have liked a version history, even limited to "vN: rebase" if such is the case) or pings (in which case I'd prefer "ping?" replies, as these replies do not create patch entries in patchwork).
It's the same patch, with no changes. I reposted since there was no response, so figured it must have been lost.
In other cases where I sent pings in replies to the patch, I was asked to repost the patch instead. Admittedly the particular case I'm thinking of here was Linux kernel patches, but the process ought to be the same; it's hard on submitters to have to remember some table of maintainer/project -> ping/repost style and similar things:-(