Hi Meteusz,
On 30 June 2016 at 12:18, Mateusz Kulikowski mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com wrote:
On 29.06.2016 05:27, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 25 June 2016 at 14:57, Matt Corallo linux@bluematt.me wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matt Corallo git@bluematt.me
drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c index aabfc71..eba20f0 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c @@ -1734,7 +1734,8 @@ int mmc_init(struct mmc *mmc) #ifdef CONFIG_DM_MMC struct mmc_uclass_priv *upriv = dev_get_uclass_priv(mmc->dev);
upriv->mmc = mmc;
if (upriv)upriv->mmc = mmc;#endif if (mmc->has_init) return 0; -- 2.1.4
Can you please add a commit message explaining why this is needed and what it fixes? How can mmc_init() be called before the MMC device is there? Is this related to this patch?
It's related in a way that it fixed crash of dragonboard before I submitted my patch :)
Not sure if it meant to fix dragonboard or some other board.
Although - imho - it's nice to make check like that.. or at least some kind of assert.
An assert() would be fine with me.
Regards, Simon