On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, York Sun wrote:
On 12/23/2015 07:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote:
York,
Just checking if you had seen this patch?
Yes, I noticed. You rename P2020RDB to P2020RDB_PC. Do you have another patch using P2020RDB?
It may be irrelevant. I have a p1020rdb-pb. So technically, unless we want to support p2020rdb-pb (which I don't have, and cannot test), you can ignore this one.
I have work here: https://github.com/bhundven/u-boot/tree/p1_p2_rdb-wip where I have reverted removing the p1_p2_rdb board, but have started to clean up the difference between p1_p2_rdb and p1_p2_rdb_pc. Eventually, it makes sense to me to move p1_p2_rdb_pc to p1_p2_rdb, as it has pc, and pd. If I can get time to finish, it would have p1020rdb-pb. Then just add the small difference for p1011rdb/p1020rdb-pb. What are your opinions on that?
The things that are difficult right now are: * ddr(2) does not use spd on pb? * I have the ltib cds that came with the board, but I still feel like I'm missing a reference manual that is for the pb version. I can find the pc and pd versions of the 1020RM online. pb just seems a little different.
-Bryan