Hi Albert,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:13:16 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:04:44 -0700, Tom Warren twarren.nvidia@gmail.com wrote:
Albert,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.netwrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:59:29 -0700, Tom Warren TWarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Albert,
-----Original Message----- From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot@aribaud.net] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:38 AM To: Stephen Warren Cc: U-Boot; Prafulla Wadaskar; Tom Rini; Tom Warren Subject: Re: [ARM] Rollback *again* -- 5 patches
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:49:45 -0600, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 04/11/2013 09:25 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello, > > Older toolchain and PPC incompatibilities appeared in the last two > additions to ToT ARM. To avoid non-bisectability, ToT has been > rolled back from abbecf4c87 to ae74b65987. This removes > > abbecf4 ARM: Fix __bss_start and __bss_end in linker scripts ... > Stephen, that is an occasion to add your proposal to aad17a2.
Tom Warren as the Tegra maintainer should be taking care of this. I
am
simply pointing out that the currently proposed changes to the SPL size checking don't fulfil the requirements for Tegra. I don't expect to have to fix the patches.
I did not mean for you to do it, only that there was an opportunity to
do it. :)
Why should I be fixing something I didn't break, and that worked fine
before your change?
Er...
Was "I did not mean for you to do it" unclear?
Yes, it was unclear.
Apologies, then. I only meant to say that we had time to discuss and incorporate your solution in the SPL max size patch series since it had
*Stephen's* solution.
Sorry, yesterday was kind of hectic.
just had to be "unapplied".
Tom
Amicalement,