
Dear Patrick Delaunay,
In message 20200331180330.11.Ic051e25812481db408f2431c7962da1db1f198fb@changeid you wrote:
This patch avoids crash in strcmp when the boot_device is not present in environment (this case should be never occur)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay patrick.delaunay@st.com
board/st/stm32mp1/stm32mp1.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/board/st/stm32mp1/stm32mp1.c b/board/st/stm32mp1/stm32mp1.c index 89a088cd28..fff4cef2c2 100644 --- a/board/st/stm32mp1/stm32mp1.c +++ b/board/st/stm32mp1/stm32mp1.c @@ -753,7 +753,8 @@ int board_late_init(void)
/* Check the boot-source to disable bootdelay */ boot_device = env_get("boot_device");
- if (!strcmp(boot_device, "serial") || !strcmp(boot_device, "usb"))
- if (boot_device &&
env_set("bootdelay", "0");(!strcmp(boot_device, "serial") || !strcmp(boot_device, "usb")))
I think this is generally a bad idea. You should have more respect to the intentions of your users. If a user defines a specific bootdelay setting in his environment, this must be respected.
I really hate vendors who believe they know better than me what I want or what is good to me. Please get rid of such stuff.
"bootdelay" is an environment variable that is intentionally user definable. You must never mess with those.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk