-----Original Message----- From: York Sun [mailto:yorksun@freescale.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:22 AM To: Hu Mingkai-B21284; u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Sun York-R58495; Liu Po-B43644 Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/c29xpcie: Add secure boot support
On 11/25/2014 01:42 AM, Mingkai Hu wrote:
From: Po Liu Po.Liu@freescale.com
Add NOR and SPI flash secure boot target for C29XPCIE board.
Signed-off-by: Po Liu Po.Liu@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Mingkai.Hu Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com
configs/C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT_defconfig | 4 ++++ configs/C29XPCIE_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT_defconfig | 4 ++++ include/configs/C29XPCIE.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 configs/C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT_defconfig create mode 100644 configs/C29XPCIE_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT_defconfig
diff --git a/configs/C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT_defconfig b/configs/C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT_defconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..86751cf --- /dev/null +++ b/configs/C29XPCIE_NOR_SECBOOT_defconfig @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="C29XPCIE,36BIT,SECURE_BOOT" +CONFIG_PPC=y +CONFIG_MPC85xx=y +CONFIG_TARGET_C29XPCIE=y diff --git a/configs/C29XPCIE_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT_defconfig b/configs/C29XPCIE_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT_defconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d1a42b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/configs/C29XPCIE_SPIFLASH_SECBOOT_defconfig @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="C29XPCIE,36BIT,SPIFLASH,SECURE_BOOT" +CONFIG_PPC=y +CONFIG_MPC85xx=y +CONFIG_TARGET_C29XPCIE=y diff --git a/include/configs/C29XPCIE.h b/include/configs/C29XPCIE.h index 5d11278..1d8dce8 100644 --- a/include/configs/C29XPCIE.h +++ b/include/configs/C29XPCIE.h @@ -579,4 +579,6 @@
#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND CONFIG_RAMBOOTCOMMAND
+#include <asm/fsl_secure_boot.h>
#endif /* __CONFIG_H */
Mingkai,
I see you sent another patch by mistake. You should add a new version number to this one because their subject are the same.
Please update MAINTAINERS file when you add new targets.
York
Hi York,
I will sent version 2 patch. I didn't find target maintain info in the MAINTAINERS file, it is about sub module maintain info. Do we need to update the MAINTAINERS file for target update?
Thanks, Mingkai