Hi Simon,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.russ@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 27/08/11 10:25, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 23:32:38 Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
I don't consider having to set up a tftp server as a bad thing - Quite the opposite really. There is plenty of network code in U-Boot that will benefit from testing under the sandbox target because it is much easier to debug. And there will be minimal impact on U-Boot code (just a sandbox 'Ethernet' driver is all that will be needed)
I am reminded of when the R&D department that developed to eNET board were doing the firmware development before the first prototypes were available - The created a HAL which used pcap from memory. I wasn't part of that team, so I really don't know the details...
Yes, sounds good, will put you down for the network testing part :-)
Arghh - Rope, meet neck. Neck, meet rope ;)
I will work on a basic patch set and try to get it to the list early next week.
Sounds good
Regards,
Graeme