To clarify a fact: I am happy with the patch. I am unhappy with the wrong "naming" that my old employer used and influenced this patch. Also the company is shipping thousands of devices per year where these patches are used.
Further clean-ups and clarifications to the support here in terms of what it does and doesn't provide are good. But to the point on reviews, yes, I do wish we had more people interested in various areas, and with time to devote to reviewing code as well. Sadly, we don't always, and I took this particular set of patches as being small enough of a global impact while (hopefully!) making future contributions both in this area and the related platforms using it more likely.
I understand your sentiment but even feedback for things like having it behind a Kconfig option to opt into, especially for a default on option, and CI weren't even addressed, it was just landed without additional revisions. I feel some of those negate the "just land it" sentiment.
Peter