
14 Nov
2019
14 Nov
'19
12:14 p.m.
On 14/11/19 2:44 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
Instead of looking getting reference to SYSFW device using name which is not guaranteed to be constant, use phandle supplied in the DT node to get reference to SYSFW
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra vigneshr@ti.com
drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c index 2380780879f5..b3947cbf432c 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c @@ -1273,7 +1273,8 @@ static int udma_probe(struct udevice *dev) return -EINVAL; }
- ret = uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_FIRMWARE, "dmsc", &tisci_dev);
- ret = uclass_get_device_by_phandle(UCLASS_FIRMWARE, dev,
if (ret) { debug("TISCI RA RM get failed (%d)\n", ret);"ti,sci", &tisci_dev);
Isn't this debug statement wrong?
Thanks and regards, Lokesh
ud->tisci = NULL;