13 Jul
2008
13 Jul
'08
11:51 a.m.
In message 9c9fda240807111847i73d45e97had293c5aba98180a@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I really would rather not duplicate all of this, which looks extremely similar to regular NAND. Is there reason why we don't use the mtd_info function pointer interface?
Agreed, It's almost same as NAND code. Now nand code uses two modes, legacy and mtd. Because I don't want to break the NAND code , I used the duplicated code. Basically it should be used the common mtd style code except legacy.
So first it added the current code, next time it tries to use the common interface and some code clean up.
I understand that you will submit a cleaned up patch later?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier.